I was in Tanzania over the past 5 days — a country under lockdown amid election-related violence. Internet access was shut down, and even the cellular network was faint and fleeting. While it was frustrating to be unable to reach family, friends, and colleagues, there was also a strange sense of relief in being untethered from constant connectivity.
The irony isn’t lost on me that this week’s MNT explores what happens when something we love is stolen — while, in those few days, our own sense of freedom, movement, and connection felt stolen too.
Fortunately, we were safe — comfortably ensconced in our hotel, with good coffee, enough food, and kind travelers from around the world.
Wishing the wonderful people of Tanzania — and all who call it home — safety, stability, and peace in the days ahead.
Four hundred and twenty seconds.
That’s all it took for the Louvre to be burgled.
In the early hours of an October morning, a group of thieves rolled a furniture lift up to the walls of the world’s most visited museum, scaled the façade of the Apollo Gallery, smashed through glass cases, stole nine items worth over $100 million, and disappeared on scooters — before most Parisians were done with their first pain au chocolat.
Seven minutes to undo centuries of vigilance. Seven minutes to turn one of humanity’s proudest symbols of preservation into a crime scene.
They didn’t just steal jewels. They stole a piece of our collective faith — the belief that some things are too sacred to be touched.
Because the Louvre isn’t merely a museum. It’s humanity’s vault — a temple to our better selves. For centuries it has stood as proof that beauty, knowledge, and imagination can outlast our worst instincts. It has survived monarchs, revolutions, and wars. During World War II, curators smuggled masterpieces into châteaux across France to protect them from the Nazis. The world’s art survived fascism, only to fall now — to indifference.
The Louvre’s failures weren’t total neglect. It was built as a royal palace long before it became a museum, a structure designed to impress, not to adapt. Its architecture — both physical and cultural — never fully evolved with its purpose. The museum’s security systems, as sophisticated as they are, operate inside a structure that was designed to showcase, not to shield. And that’s the lesson here: even the strongest systems struggle when they’re anchored to foundations that belong to another era.
The Silence After the Glass Shattered
I keep imagining the stillness that followed — the alarms silenced, the guards standing before empty cases, the reflection of fluorescent light on fractured glass.
Why is that image so haunting? Is it because it mirrors our own silence?
Is it because we scroll past tragedy faster than we feel it? Or because we outsource vigilance to systems we barely understand? Or is it because we assume someone, somewhere, is watching the walls?
But maybe what haunts us isn’t only what was stolen; it’s what it reminds us we could still lose. Because the real treasures of any civilization aren’t locked behind glass — they sit in classrooms, they dream in dormitories, they walk into the future with hope that someone is watching the walls for them.
I was reminded of this in Kenya last week — from the highlands of Nairobi to the coast of Mombasa — where I spent time with the real treasure of our time. Not jewels behind glass, but students behind desks. The Louvre may have lost millions in diamonds, but these young people are worth trillions in potential. Their ideas, their questions, their capacity to imagine a better world — these are humanity’s true crown jewels.
And yet, unlike the artifacts we guard so carefully, our students remain exposed — to outdated systems, to inequity, to neglect disguised as tradition.
Standing in those classrooms, I couldn’t help but think how fragile potential can be when the systems around it stand still. We spend millions protecting art that reminds us who we were, but invest far less in nurturing the people who will decide who we become.
The Louvre lost sight of its blind spots. Let’s hope education doesn’t.
The Slow Theft of Meaning
Every generation builds its own Louvre — institutions meant to hold what matters most. We trust them to protect truth from distortion, learning from neglect, and wisdom from noise.
But we’ve mistaken preservation for permanence. Preservation, when active and renewing, keeps knowledge alive. But when it calcifies into routine, it creates a false sense of security — the illusion that what we protect will always matter in the same way, to the same audiences, through the same tools.
Education and higher education are no different. Universities were built to preserve knowledge, tradition, and authority — not necessarily to adapt. Over time, those virtues hardened into structures that assume longevity equals relevance. Accreditation, tenure, and tradition became proxies for progress. What once anchored excellence now risks anchoring inertia.
Innovation, in this context, isn’t rebellion — it’s maintenance of purpose. The Louvre’s burglary showed what happens when systems don’t evolve; universities face the same danger. Outdated governance models, siloed departments, and rigid curricula are our cracked sensors and blind cameras. We keep polishing the marble while the wiring frays behind the walls.
Just as museums retrofit their galleries with modern security systems, universities must retrofit their intellectual and administrative infrastructure. The real guardians of learning are not walls of stone, but systems that remain responsive. Adaptive technology, interdisciplinary collaboration, and flexible credentials aren’t threats to academic integrity — they’re reinforcements against irrelevance.
A Mirror, Not a Museum
The Louvre isn’t just a French story; it’s a mirror for the world.
Across continents, our great institutions — museums, universities, governments — all face the same slow erosion. Not collapse, not chaos. Erosion. The kind that happens when vigilance becomes vanity, when purpose becomes protocol.
We update the systems, but not the spirit. We innovate faster than we introspect. And somewhere between automation and ambition, we stop asking the oldest question of all: What are we protecting this for?
The irony is that both the Louvre and our universities were once monuments to progress. Yet monuments, by design, don’t move. They were built to endure, not to adapt — and that’s their vulnerability. Universities that once expanded the boundaries of knowledge are now bound by the very frameworks they created. The danger isn’t disruption; it’s inertia disguised as integrity.
Infrastructure without imagination becomes bureaucracy; imagination without infrastructure becomes chaos. Future-readiness lives in the balance between the two.
Rebuilding What Protects Us
So what does it mean to preserve meaning in a world that refuses to stand still?
1. Relearn the art of stewardship.
Stewardship isn’t nostalgia; it’s accountability. The Louvre didn’t fall to outsiders — it fell to insiders who believed their systems were timeless. Our campuses and classrooms need stewards who remember why the walls were built in the first place.
2. Treat attention as infrastructure.
The thieves used distraction as their weapon; our world uses it as entertainment. The next generation of education must design systems that defend attention — that treat focus and discernment as the foundation of learning.
3. Guard the unquantifiable.
Curiosity, empathy, integrity — these are civilization’s crown jewels. You can’t rank them or code them, but without them, everything collapses.
4. Retrofit, don’t rebuild.
Preservation isn’t the enemy of progress. The world’s great universities don’t need to abandon tradition to innovate — they need to re-engineer it. Modernize systems to serve the same mission better: make learning more adaptive, credentials more flexible, and knowledge more porous.
5. Rebuild the infrastructure of trust.
Between student and teacher. Between institution and society. Between progress and principle. Innovation without integrity is a cracked wall waiting for a thief.
The Real Heist
The Louvre’s stolen jewels may one day be recovered. Ours may not.
Because the treasures we stand to lose — wonder, truth, trust — don’t vanish overnight. They fade quietly, until one day the cases are empty and the silence feels normal.
The tragedy of the Louvre isn’t that the thieves were bold. It’s that we were distracted. We were so busy counting visitors at the door that we stopped watching the windows.
And that’s not just a museum story. It’s a mirror held up to every classroom, newsroom, and university that believes what’s valuable will guard itself.
It won’t. Not anymore.
Beauty doesn’t protect itself.
Meaning doesn’t renew itself.
And no AI, no system, no metric can defend what we’ve stopped paying attention to.
The Louvre’s loss is a warning — not about theft, but about forgetting. Because the greatest danger isn’t that someone will steal what we love. It’s that we’ll stop noticing it’s gone.
Ex Cogitatione, Progressus
Girish
Subscribe to My Next Thought—a weekly newsletter featuring Girish Ballolla’s thoughts on international education.
